The Political Economy of Corruption Law Enforcement in Indonesia
Keywords:
Corruption Law Enforcement, Political Economy, Critical Legal Studies, Governance, Institutional AccountabilityAbstract
Corruption remains one of the most persistent challenges affecting governance, public trust, and economic development in Indonesia. Although extensive legal reforms and institutional mechanisms have been introduced to combat corruption, enforcement outcomes often reveal inconsistencies and political contestation. This study examines corruption law enforcement in Indonesia through a political economy and Critical Legal Studies perspective. Using a normative-critical methodology, the research analyzes the interaction between legal institutions, political interests, and economic power structures in shaping anti-corruption enforcement. The findings indicate that corruption law enforcement operates within a complex environment characterized by competing political agendas, institutional rivalries, and unequal access to power. Legal processes frequently reflect broader political and economic dynamics rather than functioning as entirely autonomous mechanisms of justice. The study demonstrates that selective enforcement, institutional dependence, and political intervention may undermine the effectiveness and legitimacy of anti-corruption initiatives. Furthermore, anti-corruption discourse often emphasizes legal compliance while overlooking structural factors that facilitate corrupt practices. From a critical legal perspective, corruption is not merely an individual legal violation but also a manifestation of broader governance and power relations. The research argues that sustainable anti-corruption reform requires strengthening institutional independence, enhancing public accountability, and addressing structural inequalities that enable the concentration of political and economic influence. The study concludes that effective corruption law enforcement depends on transforming both legal institutions and the political-economic conditions within which they operate. These findings contribute to critical legal scholarship by highlighting the interconnected relationship between law, power, and governance in contemporary Indonesia.
References
Aspinall, Edward. 2014. “When Brokers Betray: Clientelism, Social Networks, and Electoral Politics in Indonesia.” Comparative Politics 46 (4): 545–64.
Aspinall, Edward, and Ward Berenschot. 2019. Democracy for Sale: Elections, Clientelism, and the State in Indonesia. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
Aspinall, Edward, and Marcus Mietzner, eds. 2010. Problems of Democratisation in Indonesia: Elections, Institutions and Society. Singapore: Institute of Southeast Asian Studies.
Bardhan, Pranab. 1997. “Corruption and Development: A Review of Issues.” Journal of Economic Literature 35 (3): 1320–46.
Butt, Simon. 2012. Corruption and Law in Indonesia: The Unravelling of the Anti-Corruption Framework through Law and Legal Process. London: Routledge.
Butt, Simon. 2015. The Constitutional Court and Democracy in Indonesia. Leiden: Brill.
Butt, Simon. 2017. “The Constitutional Court and Democracy in Indonesia.” In The Indonesian Constitutional Court and Democracy, edited by Simon Butt. Leiden: Brill.
Collins, Paul, Alan Doig, and Sofie Arjon Schütte. 2012. “Against the Odds: Anti-Corruption Reform in Indonesia.” Public Administration and Development 32 (1): 38–48. doi:10.1002/pad.623.
Hadiz, Vedi R. 2004. “Decentralization and Democracy in Indonesia: A Critique of Neo-Institutionalist Perspectives.” Development and Change 35 (4): 697–718.
Hadiz, Vedi R. 2010. Localising Power in Post-Authoritarian Indonesia: A Southeast Asia Perspective. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Hadiz, Vedi R., and Richard Robison. 2013. “The Political Economy of Oligarchy and the Reorganization of Power in Indonesia.” Indonesia 96: 35–57.
Johnston, Michael. 2005. Syndromes of Corruption: Wealth, Power, and Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Kaufmann, Daniel, Aart Kraay, and Pablo Zoido-Lobatón. 1999. “Governance Matters.” World Bank Policy Research Working Paper 2196. Washington, DC: World Bank.
Kennedy, Duncan. 1982. “Legal Education and the Reproduction of Hierarchy.” Journal of Legal Education 32 (4): 591–615.
Klitgaard, Robert. 1988. Controlling Corruption. Berkeley: University of California Press.
La Porta, Rafael, Florencio Lopez-de-Silanes, Andrei Shleifer, and Robert Vishny. 1999. “The Quality of Government.” Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization 15 (1): 222–79. doi:10.1093/jleo/15.1.222.
Lindsey, Tim, and Simon Butt. 2018. Indonesian Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
McCarthy, John F., and Kathryn Robinson, eds. 2016. Land and Development in Indonesia: Searching for the People's Sovereignty. Singapore: ISEAS–Yusof Ishak Institute.
Mietzner, Marcus. 2015. “Dysfunction by Design: Political Finance and Corruption in Indonesia.” Critical Asian Studies 47 (4): 587–610. doi:10.1080/14672715.2015.1079991.
Mochtar, Zainal Arifin. 2021. “Independence of the Corruption Eradication Commission after the Amendment of the KPK Law.” Jurnal Konstitusi 18 (2): 321–44.
Neilson, Jeff. 2016. “Agrarian Transformations and Land Reform in Indonesia.” In Land and Development in Indonesia: Searching for the People’s Sovereignty, edited by John F. McCarthy and Kathryn Robinson, 245–64. Singapore: ISEAS–Yusof Ishak Institute.
Pangaribuan, Aristo. 2025. “Indonesia’s Criminal Justice System: A Case Study of Inter-Agency Conflict and the Fight for Power.” Asian Journal of Law and Society.
Persson, Anna, Bo Rothstein, and Jan Teorell. 2013. “Why Anticorruption Reforms Fail—Systemic Corruption as a Collective Action Problem.” Governance 26 (3): 449–71. doi:10.1111/j.1468-0491.2012.01604.x.
Robison, Richard, and Vedi R. Hadiz. 2004. Reorganising Power in Indonesia: The Politics of Oligarchy in an Age of Markets. London: Routledge.
Rose-Ackerman, Susan. 1975. “The Economics of Corruption.” Journal of Public Economics 4 (2): 187–203. doi:10.1016/0047-2727(75)90017-1.
Rose-Ackerman, Susan. 1999. Corruption and Government: Causes, Consequences, and Reform. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Rose-Ackerman, Susan, and Bonnie J. Palifka. 2016. Corruption and Government: Causes, Consequences, and Reform. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Schütte, Sofie Arjon. 2012. “Against the Odds: Anti-Corruption Reform in Indonesia.” Public Administration and Development 32 (1): 38–48. doi:10.1002/pad.623.
Treisman, Daniel. 2000. “The Causes of Corruption: A Cross-National Study.” Journal of Public Economics 76 (3): 399–457. doi:10.1016/S0047-2727(99)00092-4.
Unger, Roberto Mangabeira. 1983. The Critical Legal Studies Movement. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Winters, Jeffrey A. 2011. Oligarchy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Winters, Jeffrey A. 2013. “Oligarchy and Democracy in Indonesia.” In Democracy and Authoritarianism in Indonesia, edited by Edward Aspinall and Marcus Mietzner. Singapore: ISEAS–Yusof Ishak Institute.
International and Institutional Sources
Corruption Eradication Commission of the Republic of Indonesia (KPK). 2024. Annual Report 2024. Jakarta: Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi.
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). 2024. OECD Economic Surveys: Indonesia 2024. Paris: OECD Publishing.
Transparency International. 2017. Strengthening Anti-Corruption Agencies in Asia Pacific. Berlin: Transparency International.
United Nations. 2003. United Nations Convention against Corruption. New York: United Nations.
United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime. 2004. United Nations Convention against Corruption. Vienna: United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime.
World Bank. 2000. Anticorruption in Transition: A Contribution to the Policy Debate. Washington, DC: World Bank.
World Bank. 2004. Making Services Work for Poor People. World Development Report 2004. Washington, DC: World Bank.
Indonesian Legal and Constitutional Sources
Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia. 1945. The 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia.
Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia. 2019. Decision Number 70/PUU-XVII/2019 concerning the Judicial Review of Law Number 19 of 2019 on the Second Amendment to Law Number 30 of 2002 concerning the Corruption Eradication Commission.
Indonesia. 1999. Law Number 31 of 1999 concerning the Eradication of Criminal Acts of Corruption.
Indonesia. 2001. Law Number 20 of 2001 concerning Amendments to Law Number 31 of 1999 concerning the Eradication of Criminal Acts of Corruption.
Indonesia. 2002. Law Number 30 of 2002 concerning the Corruption Eradication Commission.
Indonesia. 2006. Law Number 7 of 2006 concerning the Ratification of the United Nations Convention against Corruption, 2003.
Indonesia. 2019. Law Number 19 of 2019 concerning the Second Amendment to Law Number 30 of 2002 concerning the Corruption Eradication Commission.
Indonesia. 2023. Law Number 1 of 2023 concerning the Criminal Code.
People's Consultative Assembly of the Republic of Indonesia. 2001. Decree of the People's Consultative Assembly Number IX/MPR/2001 concerning Agrarian Reform and Natural Resource Management.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Ridwan Arifin, Auliya Rochman, Muhammad Ikram Nur Fuady (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
All writings published in this journal are the personal views of the authors and do not represent the views of this journal and the author's affiliated institutions. Author(s) retain copyrights without any restriction under the license of a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0).
