Critical Legal Analysis of Criminalization Against Environmental Activists in Indonesia
Keywords:
Environmental Activists, Criminalization, Critical Legal Studies, Civil Society, Environmental GovernanceAbstract
Environmental activists play an essential role in promoting ecological protection, community rights, and governmental accountability. However, environmental advocacy in Indonesia is increasingly accompanied by legal actions that allegedly criminalize activists and restrict civic participation. This study critically analyzes the phenomenon of criminalization against environmental activists in Indonesia through the framework of Critical Legal Studies. Using a normative and critical legal methodology, the research examines legal provisions, law enforcement practices, and judicial processes associated with environmental activism. The findings reveal that criminalization frequently occurs through the strategic use of defamation laws, public order regulations, and other legal instruments that may be interpreted broadly against individuals and groups challenging powerful economic interests. Such practices create a chilling effect on public participation and undermine democratic engagement in environmental governance. The study further demonstrates that law is not always applied as a neutral mechanism for dispute resolution but can function as an instrument of power that reinforces existing social and economic hierarchies. The unequal distribution of legal resources and political influence often places environmental activists in vulnerable positions when confronting state institutions or corporate actors. The research argues that stronger legal safeguards are necessary to protect environmental defenders and ensure meaningful public participation in environmental decision-making. The study concludes that the criminalization of environmental activism reflects broader tensions between economic development, environmental protection, and democratic freedoms. These findings contribute to critical legal debates concerning the role of law in shaping power relations and the protection of civil society within Indonesia’s environmental governance framework.
References
Bodnar, Adam, and Aleksandra Gliszczyńska-Grabias. 2023. “Strategic Lawsuits against Public Participation (SLAPPs), the Governance of Historical Memory in the Rule of Law Crisis, and the EU Anti-SLAPP Directive.” European Constitutional Law Review 19 (4): 642–663. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1574019624000063.
Canan, Penelope. 1989. “The SLAPP from a Sociological Perspective.” Pace Environmental Law Review 7 (1): 23–36. https://doi.org/10.58948/0738-6206.1536.
Canan, Penelope, and George W. Pring. 1988. “Strategic Lawsuits Against Public Participation.” Social Problems 35 (5): 506–519. https://doi.org/10.2307/800612.
Canan, Penelope, and George W. Pring. 1988. “Studying Strategic Lawsuits Against Public Participation: Mixing Quantitative and Qualitative Approaches.” Law & Society Review 22 (2): 385–395. https://doi.org/10.2307/3053441.
Farrington, Francesca, and Magdalena Zabrocka. 2023. “Punishment by Process: The Development of Anti-SLAPP Legislation in the European Union.” ERA Forum 24: 373–388. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12027-023-00774-5.
Fernando, Zico Junius, Pujiyono, Umi Rozah, and Nur Rochaeti. 2022. “The Freedom of Expression in Indonesia.” Cogent Social Sciences 8 (1): 2103944. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311886.2022.2103944.
Firdaus, Adam Putra, and Muhammad Rafliansah Aziz. 2025. “Dualisme Pemaknaan Anti Eco-SLAPP sebagai Alasan Gugurnya Kewenangan Penuntutan dan Alasan Penghapus Pidana: Analisis terhadap Regulasi dan Putusan Anti-SLAPP di Indonesia.” Jurnal Hukum Lingkungan Indonesia 10 (1). https://doi.org/10.38011/jhli.v10i1.836.
Handayani, Marsya Mutmainah, Julio Castor Achmadi, and Prilia Kartika Apsari. 2022. “Berbagai Wajah Fenomena SLAPP di Indonesia.” Jurnal Hukum Lingkungan Indonesia 8 (1). https://doi.org/10.38011/jhli.v8i1.369.
Harahap, Irawan, and Riantika Pratiwi. 2023. “Perkembangan Pengaturan Anti-SLAPP di Bidang Lingkungan Hidup Menurut Hukum Indonesia.” Jotika Research in Business Law 2 (2). https://doi.org/10.56445/jrbl.v2i2.96.
Hutchinson, Allan C., and Patrick J. Monahan. 1984. “Law, Politics, and the Critical Legal Scholars: The Unfolding Drama of American Legal Thought.” Stanford Law Review 36: 199–245.
Indrawati, Nani. 2022. “Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Partisipasi Masyarakat (Anti SLAPP) dalam Penegakan Hukum Lingkungan Hidup di Indonesia.” Media Iuris 5 (1). https://doi.org/10.20473/mi.v5i1.33052.
Indriasari, Devi Tri. 2023. “Kebebasan Berekspresi dalam Tekanan Regulasi: Studi terhadap Undang-Undang Informasi dan Transaksi Elektronik (UU ITE).” Masyarakat Indonesia 49 (2). https://doi.org/10.14203/jmi.v49i2.1373.
Kamal, Ubaidillah, Ali Masyhar, Muhammad Adymas Hikal Fikri, Rayi Kharisma Rajib, and Siti Hafsyah Idris. 2024. “The Urgency of Anti-SLAPP Regulatory Renewal in Indonesian Environmental Law.” Pandecta Research Law Journal 19 (1): 265–288. https://doi.org/10.15294/pandecta.vol19i1.7237.
Kennedy, Duncan. 1976. “Form and Substance in Private Law Adjudication.” Harvard Law Review 89 (8): 1685–1778.
Kennedy, Duncan. 1986. “Freedom and Constraint in Adjudication: A Critical Phenomenology.” Journal of Legal Education 36: 518–562.
Munger, Frank W., and Carroll Seron. 1984. “Critical Legal Studies versus Critical Legal Theory: A Comment on Method.” Law & Policy 6 (3): 257–297. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9930.1984.tb00326.x.
Shapiro, Pamela. 2010. “SLAPPs: Intent or Content? Anti-SLAPP Legislation Goes International.” Review of European Community & International Environmental Law 19 (1): 14–27. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9388.2010.00661.x.
Stoycheff, Elizabeth, Juan Liu, Kai Xu, and Kunto Wibowo. 2019. “Privacy and the Panopticon: Online Mass Surveillance’s Deterrence and Chilling Effects.” New Media & Society 21 (3): 602–619. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444818801317.
Wongkar, Etheldreda E. L. T., Julio Castor Achmadi, and Theresia Iswarini. 2022. “Ketentuan dan Penegakan Hukum Anti-SLAPP terhadap Perempuan Pembela HAM atas Lingkungan Hidup dalam Perspektif Teori Hukum Feminis.” Jurnal Hukum Lingkungan Indonesia 8 (1). https://doi.org/10.38011/jhli.v8i1.371.
Yüksel, İsmail. 2022. “Anti-SLAPP Law in USA.” Ankara Hacı Bayram Veli Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi 26 (2): 563–588. https://doi.org/10.34246/ahbvuhfd.1076923.
Indonesian Constitutional and Statutory Legal Sources
Indonesia. Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945.
Indonesia. Undang-Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2008 tentang Informasi dan Transaksi Elektronik. Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 2008 Nomor 58, Tambahan Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Nomor 4843.
Indonesia. Undang-Undang Nomor 19 Tahun 2016 tentang Perubahan atas Undang-Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2008 tentang Informasi dan Transaksi Elektronik. Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 2016 Nomor 251, Tambahan Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Nomor 5952.
Indonesia. Undang-Undang Nomor 32 Tahun 2009 tentang Perlindungan dan Pengelolaan Lingkungan Hidup. Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 2009 Nomor 140, Tambahan Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Nomor 5059.
Indonesia. Undang-Undang Nomor 6 Tahun 2023 tentang Penetapan Peraturan Pemerintah Pengganti Undang-Undang Nomor 2 Tahun 2022 tentang Cipta Kerja Menjadi Undang-Undang. Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 2023 Nomor 41, Tambahan Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Nomor 6856.
Indonesia. Undang-Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 2024 tentang Perubahan Kedua atas Undang-Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2008 tentang Informasi dan Transaksi Elektronik. Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 2024 Nomor 1, Tambahan Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Nomor 6905.
Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia. Peraturan Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia Nomor 1 Tahun 2023 tentang Pedoman Mengadili Perkara Lingkungan Hidup.
Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia. Surat Keputusan Ketua Mahkamah Agung Nomor 36/KMA/SK/II/2013 tentang Pemberlakuan Pedoman Penanganan Perkara Lingkungan Hidup.
Judicial Decisions
Pengadilan Negeri Jepara. Putusan Nomor 14/Pid.Sus/2024/PN Jpa, 4 April 2024.
Pengadilan Tinggi Semarang. Putusan Nomor 374/Pid.Sus/2024/PT SMG, 21 May 2024.
Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia. Putusan Nomor 105/PUU-XXII/2024, 2025. Pengujian Undang-Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 2024 tentang Perubahan Kedua atas Undang-Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2008 tentang Informasi dan Transaksi Elektronik terhadap Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945.
Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia. Putusan Nomor 119/PUU-XXIII/2025, 2025. Pengujian Penjelasan Pasal 66 Undang-Undang Nomor 32 Tahun 2009 tentang Perlindungan dan Pengelolaan Lingkungan Hidup.
Institutional and Human Rights Sources
Komisi Nasional Hak Asasi Manusia Republik Indonesia. “Tanggapan Komnas HAM atas Putusan Majelis Hakim Pengadilan Tinggi Semarang terhadap Kasus Pelanggaran UU ITE oleh Sdr. Daniel Frits Maurits Tangkilisan.” Keterangan Pers Nomor 26/HM.00/V/2024, 22 May 2024.
Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia. “Kerangka Acuan Kegiatan Sosialisasi PERMA Nomor 1 Tahun 2023 bagi Wilayah Indonesia Bagian Barat.” 2024.
Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia. Risalah Sidang Perkara Nomor 105/PUU-XXII/2024 dan Perkara Nomor 115/PUU-XXII/2024. 5 December 2024.
International and Comparative Legal Sources
European Union. Directive (EU) 2024/1069 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 April 2024 on the Protection of Persons Who Engage in Public Participation from Manifestly Unfounded Claims or Abusive Court Proceedings (“Strategic Lawsuits Against Public Participation”). Official Journal of the European Union, 2024.
United Nations Human Rights Committee. General Comment No. 34: Article 19: Freedoms of Opinion and Expression. CCPR/C/GC/34. 2011.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Tengku Ismail Rohmat, Sascia Adelia Putri Wardhani (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
All writings published in this journal are the personal views of the authors and do not represent the views of this journal and the author's affiliated institutions. Author(s) retain copyrights without any restriction under the license of a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0).
