Digital Surveillance, State Power, and Civil Liberties in Contemporary Indonesia
Keywords:
Digital Surveillance, State Power, Civil Liberties, Privacy Rights, Critical Legal StudiesAbstract
The rapid expansion of digital technologies has transformed governance, public administration, and security practices across the world, including Indonesia. While digital surveillance technologies offer opportunities to enhance public security and administrative efficiency, they also raise significant concerns regarding privacy, accountability, and civil liberties. This study critically examines the relationship between digital surveillance, state power, and civil liberties in contemporary Indonesia through the lens of Critical Legal Studies. Using a normative-critical approach, the research analyzes legal frameworks governing electronic information, data collection, cybersecurity, and state surveillance practices. The findings reveal that digital surveillance mechanisms increasingly expand the capacity of state institutions to monitor individuals and regulate public behavior. However, legal safeguards concerning privacy rights, transparency, and oversight mechanisms remain insufficient in addressing potential abuses of power. The study demonstrates that surveillance technologies are not merely technical instruments but are embedded within broader political and legal structures that shape relationships between citizens and the state. From a critical perspective, the expansion of surveillance capabilities may reinforce asymmetrical power relations and limit democratic freedoms when accountability mechanisms are weak. The research argues that effective regulation must balance legitimate security objectives with the protection of constitutional rights and civil liberties. Strengthening judicial oversight, data protection standards, and public accountability frameworks is essential for maintaining democratic governance in the digital era. The study concludes that critical examination of surveillance law is necessary to prevent the normalization of excessive state control and to safeguard individual freedoms within Indonesia’s evolving digital society.
References
Andrejevic, Mark. 2007. “Surveillance in the Digital Enclosure.” The Communication Review 10 (4): 295–317.
Arifin, Zainal, Zico Junius Fernando, and Emi Puasa Handayani. 2025. “Legal Implications of the Second Amendment to the Electronic Information and Transactions Law: Balancing Freedom of Expression and Public Participation in Digital Democracy.” LITIGASI 26 (1): 192–227.
Ball, Kirstie. 2009. “Exposure: Exploring the Subject of Surveillance.” Information, Communication & Society 12 (5): 639–657.
Büchi, Moritz, Nadja Festic, and Michael Latzer. 2022. “The Chilling Effects of Digital Dataveillance: A Theoretical Model and an Empirical Study.” Big Data & Society 9 (1).
Chan, Jason, Junyi Yi, and Dmitry Kuznetsov. 2024. “Digital Repression and Political Participation: Government Surveillance, Online Information, and Political Engagement.” New Media & Society.
Cohen, Julie E. 2013. “What Privacy Is For.” Harvard Law Review 126 (7): 1904–1933.
Crawford, Kate, and Jason Schultz. 2014. “Big Data and Due Process: Toward a Framework to Redress Predictive Privacy Harms.” Boston College Law Review 55 (1): 93–128.
Citron, Danielle Keats. 2008. “Technological Due Process.” Washington Law Review 85 (4): 1249–1313.
Citron, Danielle Keats, and Frank Pasquale. 2011. “Network Accountability for the Domestic Use of Artificial Intelligence.” Washington Law Review 89 (4): 1451–1492.
De Hert, Paul, and Vagelis Papakonstantinou. 2016. “The New General Data Protection Regulation: Still a Sound System for the Protection of Individuals?” Computer Law & Security Review 32 (2): 179–194.
Fernando, Zico Junius, Pujiyono, Umi Rozah, and Nur Rochaeti. 2022. “The Freedom of Expression in Indonesia.” Cogent Social Sciences 8 (1): 2103944.
Gandy, Oscar H. 1993. “The Panoptic Sort: A Political Economy of Personal Information.” Critical Studies in Mass Communication 10 (2): 139–163.
Haggerty, Kevin D., and Richard V. Ericson. 2000. “The Surveillant Assemblage.” British Journal of Sociology 51 (4): 605–622.
Koskela, Hille. 2003. “Cam Era—The Contemporary Urban Panopticon.” Surveillance & Society 1 (3): 292–313.
Kuner, Christopher. 2017. “The Internet and the Global Reach of EU Law.” International Data Privacy Law 7 (2): 1–12.
Mantelero, Alessandro. 2017. “Regulating Big Data: The Guidelines of the Council of Europe in the Context of the European Data Protection Framework.” Computer Law & Security Review 33 (5): 584–602.
Mann, Steve, and Joseph Ferenbok. 2013. “New Media and the Power Politics of Sousveillance in a Surveillance-Dominated World.” Surveillance & Society 11 (1–2): 18–34.
Marx, Gary T. 2002. “What’s New About the ‘New Surveillance’?” Surveillance & Society 1 (1): 9–29.
Mittelstadt, Brent Daniel, Patrick Allo, Mariarosaria Taddeo, Sandra Wachter, and Luciano Floridi. 2016. “The Ethics of Algorithms: Mapping the Debate.” Big Data & Society 3 (2).
Monahan, Torin. 2011. “Surveillance as Cultural Practice.” The Sociological Quarterly 52 (4): 495–508.
Nissenbaum, Helen. 2004. “Privacy as Contextual Integrity.” Washington Law Review 79 (1): 119–158.
Ohm, Paul. 2009. “Broken Promises of Privacy: Responding to the Surprising Failure of Anonymization.” UCLA Law Review 57 (6): 1701–1777.
Pasquale, Frank. 2010. “A Rule of Persons, Not Machines: The Limits of Legal Automation.” George Washington Law Review 89 (1): 1–60.
Pearson, James. 2024. “Digital Authoritarianism: Defining and Differentiating the Concept.” Philosophy & Technology 37.
Regan, Priscilla M. 2011. “Privacy as a Common Good in the Digital World.” Information, Communication & Society 14 (6): 1–17.
Richards, Neil M. 2013. “The Dangers of Surveillance.” Harvard Law Review 126 (7): 1934–1965.
Satwiko, Wira. 2021. “Personal Data Protection in Indonesia: A Comparative Perspective.” Journal of Indonesian Legal Studies.
Sinpeng, Aim. 2020. “Digital Media, Political Authoritarianism, and Democratic Resilience in Southeast Asia.” International Communication Gazette 82 (4): 1–19.
Satriawan, Iwan, Tareq Muhammad Aziz Elven Indrayana, and Tanto Lailam. 2023. “Internet Shutdown in Indonesia: An Appropriate Response or A Threat to Human Rights?” Sriwijaya Law Review 7 (1): 19–46.
Solove, Daniel J. 2006. “A Taxonomy of Privacy.” University of Pennsylvania Law Review 154 (3): 477–560.
Stoycheff, Elizabeth. 2016. “Under Surveillance: Examining Facebook’s Spiral of Silence Effects in the Wake of NSA Internet Monitoring.” Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly 93 (2): 296–311.
Stoycheff, Elizabeth, Juan Liu, Kai Xu, and Kunto Wibowo. 2019. “Privacy and the Panopticon: Online Mass Surveillance’s Deterrence and Chilling Effects.” New Media & Society 21 (3): 602–619.
Venkatesh, Viswanath. 2021. “The Surveillance Economy and the Challenge of Digital Autonomy.” Information Systems Journal.
Wachter, Sandra, and Brent Mittelstadt. 2019. “A Right to Reasonable Inferences: Re-Thinking Data Protection Law in the Age of Big Data and AI.” Columbia Business Law Review 2019 (2): 494–620.
Yeung, Karen. 2018. “Algorithmic Regulation: A Critical Interrogation.” Regulation & Governance 12 (4): 505–523.
Zarsky, Tal. 2016. “The Trouble with Algorithmic Decisions: An Analytic Road Map to Examine Efficiency and Fairness in Automated and Opaque Decision Making.” Science, Technology, & Human Values 41 (1): 118–132.
Zuboff, Shoshana. 2015. “Big Other: Surveillance Capitalism and the Prospects of an Information Civilization.” Journal of Information Technology 30 (1): 75–89.
Indriasari, Devi Tri. 2023. “Kebebasan Berekspresi dalam Tekanan Regulasi: Studi terhadap Undang-Undang Informasi dan Transaksi Elektronik (UU ITE).” Masyarakat Indonesia 49 (2).
Imanuel, Tommi, Warjio, and Indra Fauzan. 2023. “Analysis of Freedom of Expression in the Digital Age in the Issue of Electronic Information and Transaction Law in Indonesia.” PERSPEKTIF 12 (4): 1117–1126.
Ayu Silvi, Ferina Widyawati, and Anom Wahyu Asmorojati. 2022. “The Urgency of Establishing a Special Agency of Personal Data Protection and Supervision to Ensure the Indonesian Citizens’ Privacy Rights.” Borobudur Law Review 4 (2): 110–122.
Ningrat, Shinta Ressmy Cakra, Caroline Paskarina, and Mudiyati Rahmatunnisa. 2024. “Praktik State Censorship terhadap Demokrasi Indonesia.” International Journal of Demos 6 (1).
Puspita, Amelia, and Melyana. 2026. “The Paradox of Freedom of Expression: An Evaluation of the Implementation of the ITE Law from a Human Rights Perspective in Indonesia.” EJREV Law 4 (1).
Festic, Nadja, Moritz Büchi, and Michael Latzer. 2026. “Dataveillance and the Chilling Effects of Digital Surveillance: Experimental Evidence.” Journal of Communication 76 (4): 277–296.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Muhammad Abdurrahman (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
All writings published in this journal are the personal views of the authors and do not represent the views of this journal and the author's affiliated institutions. Author(s) retain copyrights without any restriction under the license of a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0).
